Opening options for material transfer.

UNLABELLED: The Open Material Transfer Agreement is a material-transfer agreement that enables broader sharing and use of biological materials by biotechnology practitioners working within the practical realities of technology transfer. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version of this article (doi:10.1038/nbt.4263) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users

Achieving Optimal Growth through Product Feedback Inhibition in Metabolism

Recent evidence suggests that the metabolism of some organisms, such as Escherichia coli, is remarkably efficient, producing close to the maximum amount of biomass per unit of nutrient consumed. This observation raises the question of what regulatory mechanisms enable such efficiency. Here, we propose that simple product-feedback inhibition by itself is capable of leading to such optimality. We analyze several representative metabolic modules—starting from a linear pathway and advancing to a bidirectional pathway and metabolic cycle, and finally to integration of two different nutrient inputs. In each case, our mathematical analysis shows that product-feedback inhibition is not only homeostatic but also, with appropriate feedback connections, can minimize futile cycling and optimize fluxes. However, the effectiveness of simple product-feedback inhibition comes at the cost of high levels of some metabolite pools, potentially associated with toxicity and osmotic imbalance. These large metabolite pool sizes can be restricted if feedback inhibition is ultrasensitive. Indeed, the multi-layer regulation of metabolism by control of enzyme expression, enzyme covalent modification, and allostery is expected to result in such ultrasensitive feedbacks. To experimentally test whether the qualitative predictions from our analysis of feedback inhibition apply to metabolic modules beyond linear pathways, we examine the case of nitrogen assimilation in E. coli, which involves both nutrient integration and a metabolic cycle. We find that the feedback regulation scheme suggested by our mathematical analysis closely aligns with the actual regulation of the network and is sufficient to explain much of the dynamical behavior of relevant metabolite pool sizes in nutrient-switching experiments

Synthetic biology to access and expand nature's chemical diversity

Bacterial genomes encode the biosynthetic potential to produce hundreds of thousands of complex molecules with diverse applications, from medicine to agriculture and materials. Accessing these natural products promises to reinvigorate drug discovery pipelines and provide novel routes to synthesize complex chemicals. The pathways leading to the production of these molecules often comprise dozens of genes spanning large areas of the genome and are controlled by complex regulatory networks with some of the most interesting molecules being produced by non-model organisms. In this Review, we discuss how advances in synthetic biology — including novel DNA construction technologies, the use of genetic parts for the precise control of expression and for synthetic regulatory circuits — and multiplexed genome engineering can be used to optimize the design and synthesis of pathways that produce natural products

Principles of genetic circuit design

Cells navigate environments, communicate and build complex patterns by initiating gene expression in response to specific signals. Engineers seek to harness this capability to program cells to perform tasks or create chemicals and materials that match the complexity seen in nature. This Review describes new tools that aid the construction of genetic circuits. Circuit dynamics can be influenced by the choice of regulators and changed with expression 'tuning knobs'. We collate the failure modes encountered when assembling circuits, quantify their impact on performance and review mitigation efforts. Finally, we discuss the constraints that arise from circuits having to operate within a living cell. Collectively, better tools, well-characterized parts and a comprehensive understanding of how to compose circuits are leading to a breakthrough in the ability to program living cells for advanced applications, from living therapeutics to the atomic manufacturing of functional materials.National Institute of General Medical Sciences (U.S.) (Grant P50 GM098792)National Institute of General Medical Sciences (U.S.) (Grant R01 GM095765)National Science Foundation (U.S.). Synthetic Biology Engineering Research Center (EEC0540879)Life Technologies, Inc. (A114510)National Science Foundation (U.S.). Graduate Research FellowshipUnited States. Office of Naval Research. Multidisciplinary University Research Initiative (Grant 4500000552

Full design automation of multi-state RNA devices to program gene expression using energy-based optimization

[EN] Small RNAs (sRNAs) can operate as regulatory agents to control protein expression by interaction with the 59 untranslated region of the mRNA. We have developed a physicochemical framework, relying on base pair interaction energies, to design multi-state sRNA devices by solving an optimization problem with an objective function accounting for the stability of the transition and final intermolecular states. Contrary to the analysis of the reaction kinetics of an ensemble of sRNAs, we solve the inverse problem of finding sequences satisfying targeted reactions. We show here that our objective function correlates well with measured riboregulatory activity of a set of mutants. This has enabled the application of the methodology for an extended design of RNA devices with specified behavior, assuming different molecular interaction models based on Watson-Crick interaction. We designed several YES, NOT, AND, and OR logic gates, including the design of combinatorial riboregulators. In sum, our de novo approach provides a new paradigm in synthetic biology to design molecular interaction mechanisms facilitating future high-throughput functional sRNA design.Work supported by the grants FP7-ICT-043338 (BACTOCOM) to AJ, and BIO2011-26741 (Ministerio de Economia y Competitividad, Spain) to JAD. GR is supported by an EMBO long-term fellowship co-funded by Marie Curie actions (ALTF-1177-2011), and TEL by a PhD fellowship from the AXA Research Fund. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.Rodrigo Tarrega, G.; Landrain, TE.; Majer, E.; Daros Arnau, JA.; Jaramillo, A. (2013). Full design automation of multi-state RNA devices to program gene expression using energy-based optimization. PLoS Computational Biology. 9(8):1003172-1003172. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1003172S1003172100317298Isaacs, F. J., Dwyer, D. J., & Collins, J. J. (2006). RNA synthetic biology. Nature Biotechnology, 24(5), 545-554. doi:10.1038/nbt1208Isaacs, F. J., Dwyer, D. J., Ding, C., Pervouchine, D. D., Cantor, C. R., & Collins, J. J. (2004). Engineered riboregulators enable post-transcriptional control of gene expression. Nature Biotechnology, 22(7), 841-847. doi:10.1038/nbt986Lucks, J. B., Qi, L., Mutalik, V. K., Wang, D., & Arkin, A. P. (2011). Versatile RNA-sensing transcriptional regulators for engineering genetic networks. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 108(21), 8617-8622. doi:10.1073/pnas.1015741108Mutalik, V. K., Qi, L., Guimaraes, J. C., Lucks, J. B., & Arkin, A. P. (2012). Rationally designed families of orthogonal RNA regulators of translation. Nature Chemical Biology, 8(5), 447-454. doi:10.1038/nchembio.919Bayer, T. S., & Smolke, C. D. (2005). Programmable ligand-controlled riboregulators of eukaryotic gene expression. Nature Biotechnology, 23(3), 337-343. doi:10.1038/nbt1069Nakashima, N., & Tamura, T. (2009). Conditional gene silencing of multiple genes with antisense RNAs and generation of a mutator strain of Escherichia coli. Nucleic Acids Research, 37(15), e103-e103. doi:10.1093/nar/gkp498Callura, J. M., Cantor, C. R., & Collins, J. J. (2012). Genetic switchboard for synthetic biology applications. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 109(15), 5850-5855. doi:10.1073/pnas.1203808109Beisel, C. L., Bayer, T. S., Hoff, K. G., & Smolke, C. D. (2008). Model‐guided design of ligand‐regulated RNAi for programmable control of gene expression. Molecular Systems Biology, 4(1), 224. doi:10.1038/msb.2008.62Qi, L., Lucks, J. B., Liu, C. C., Mutalik, V. K., & Arkin, A. P. (2012). Engineering naturally occurring trans -acting non-coding RNAs to sense molecular signals. Nucleic Acids Research, 40(12), 5775-5786. doi:10.1093/nar/gks168Carothers, J. M., Goler, J. A., Juminaga, D., & Keasling, J. D. (2011). Model-Driven Engineering of RNA Devices to Quantitatively Program Gene Expression. Science, 334(6063), 1716-1719. doi:10.1126/science.1212209Rodrigo, G., Landrain, T. E., & Jaramillo, A. (2012). De novo automated design of small RNA circuits for engineering synthetic riboregulation in living cells. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 109(38), 15271-15276. doi:10.1073/pnas.1203831109Brantl, S. (2002). Antisense-RNA regulation and RNA interference. Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA) - Gene Structure and Expression, 1575(1-3), 15-25. doi:10.1016/s0167-4781(02)00280-4Majdalani, N., Vanderpool, C. K., & Gottesman, S. (2005). Bacterial Small RNA Regulators. Critical Reviews in Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, 40(2), 93-113. doi:10.1080/10409230590918702Selinger, D. W., Cheung, K. J., Mei, R., Johansson, E. M., Richmond, C. S., Blattner, F. R., … Church, G. M. (2000). RNA expression analysis using a 30 base pair resolution Escherichia coli genome array. Nature Biotechnology, 18(12), 1262-1268. doi:10.1038/82367Yelin, R., Dahary, D., Sorek, R., Levanon, E. Y., Goldstein, O., Shoshan, A., … Rotman, G. (2003). Widespread occurrence of antisense transcription in the human genome. Nature Biotechnology, 21(4), 379-386. doi:10.1038/nbt808Wang, X.-J., Gaasterland, T., & Chua, N.-H. (2005). Genome Biology, 6(4), R30. doi:10.1186/gb-2005-6-4-r30Stojanovic, M. N., & Stefanovic, D. (2003). A deoxyribozyme-based molecular automaton. Nature Biotechnology, 21(9), 1069-1074. doi:10.1038/nbt862Seelig, G., Soloveichik, D., Zhang, D. Y., & Winfree, E. (2006). Enzyme-Free Nucleic Acid Logic Circuits. Science, 314(5805), 1585-1588. doi:10.1126/science.1132493Yin, P., Choi, H. M. T., Calvert, C. R., & Pierce, N. A. (2008). Programming biomolecular self-assembly pathways. Nature, 451(7176), 318-322. doi:10.1038/nature06451Ran, T., Kaplan, S., & Shapiro, E. (2009). Molecular implementation of simple logic programs. Nature Nanotechnology, 4(10), 642-648. doi:10.1038/nnano.2009.203Penchovsky, R., & Breaker, R. R. (2005). Computational design and experimental validation of oligonucleotide-sensing allosteric ribozymes. Nature Biotechnology, 23(11), 1424-1433. doi:10.1038/nbt1155Salis, H. M., Mirsky, E. A., & Voigt, C. A. (2009). Automated design of synthetic ribosome binding sites to control protein expression. Nature Biotechnology, 27(10), 946-950. doi:10.1038/nbt.1568Laidler, K. J., & King, M. C. (1983). Development of transition-state theory. The Journal of Physical Chemistry, 87(15), 2657-2664. doi:10.1021/j100238a002Sosnick, T. R., & Pan, T. (2003). RNA folding: models and perspectives. Current Opinion in Structural Biology, 13(3), 309-316. doi:10.1016/s0959-440x(03)00066-6Yurke, B. (2003). Genetic Programming and Evolvable Machines, 4(2), 111-122. doi:10.1023/a:1023928811651Bandyra, K. J., Said, N., Pfeiffer, V., Górna, M. W., Vogel, J., & Luisi, B. F. (2012). The Seed Region of a Small RNA Drives the Controlled Destruction of the Target mRNA by the Endoribonuclease RNase E. Molecular Cell, 47(6), 943-953. doi:10.1016/j.molcel.2012.07.015Dawid, A., Cayrol, B., & Isambert, H. (2009). RNA synthetic biology inspired from bacteria: construction of transcription attenuators under antisense regulation. Physical Biology, 6(2), 025007. doi:10.1088/1478-3975/6/2/025007Lioliou, E., Romilly, C., Romby, P., & Fechter, P. (2010). RNA-mediated regulation in bacteria: from natural to artificial systems. New Biotechnology, 27(3), 222-235. doi:10.1016/j.nbt.2010.03.002Dirks, R. M., Bois, J. S., Schaeffer, J. M., Winfree, E., & Pierce, N. A. (2007). Thermodynamic Analysis of Interacting Nucleic Acid Strands. SIAM Review, 49(1), 65-88. doi:10.1137/060651100Das, R., Karanicolas, J., & Baker, D. (2010). Atomic accuracy in predicting and designing noncanonical RNA structure. Nature Methods, 7(4), 291-294. doi:10.1038/nmeth.1433Vogel, J., & Luisi, B. F. (2011). Hfq and its constellation of RNA. Nature Reviews Microbiology, 9(8), 578-589. doi:10.1038/nrmicro2615Friedland, A. E., Lu, T. K., Wang, X., Shi, D., Church, G., & Collins, J. J. (2009). Synthetic Gene Networks That Count. Science, 324(5931), 1199-1202. doi:10.1126/science.1172005Rodrigo, G., Carrera, J., Landrain, T. E., & Jaramillo, A. (2012). Perspectives on the automatic design of regulatory systems for synthetic biology. FEBS Letters, 586(15), 2037-2042. doi:10.1016/j.febslet.2012.02.031Chin, J. W. (2006). Modular approaches to expanding the functions of living matter. Nature Chemical Biology, 2(6), 304-311. doi:10.1038/nchembio789McCaskill, J. S. (1990). The equilibrium partition function and base pair binding probabilities for RNA secondary structure. Biopolymers, 29(6-7), 1105-1119. doi:10.1002/bip.360290621Chitsaz, H., Salari, R., Sahinalp, S. C., & Backofen, R. (2009). A partition function algorithm for interacting nucleic acid strands. Bioinformatics, 25(12), i365-i373. doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btp212Hofacker, I. L., Fontana, W., Stadler, P. F., Bonhoeffer, L. S., Tacker, M., & Schuster, P. (1994). Fast folding and comparison of RNA secondary structures. Monatshefte f�r Chemie Chemical Monthly, 125(2), 167-188. doi:10.1007/bf00818163Andronescu, M., Zhang, Z. C., & Condon, A. (2005). Secondary Structure Prediction of Interacting RNA Molecules. Journal of Molecular Biology, 345(5), 987-1001. doi:10.1016/j.jmb.2004.10.082Mathews, D. H., Sabina, J., Zuker, M., & Turner, D. H. (1999). Expanded sequence dependence of thermodynamic parameters improves prediction of RNA secondary structure. Journal of Molecular Biology, 288(5), 911-940. doi:10.1006/jmbi.1999.2700Kirkpatrick, S., Gelatt, C. D., & Vecchi, M. P. (1983). Optimization by Simulated Annealing. Science, 220(4598), 671-680. doi:10.1126/science.220.4598.67

Oligo- and dsDNA-mediated genome editing using a tetA dual selection system in Escherichia coli

The ability to precisely and seamlessly modify a target genome is needed for metabolic engineering and synthetic biology techniques aimed at creating potent biosystems. Herein, we report on a promising method in Escherichia coli that relies on the insertion of an optimized tetA dual selection cassette followed by replacement of the same cassette with short, single-stranded DNA (oligos) or long, double-stranded DNA and the isolation of recombinant strains by negative selection using NiCl2. This method could be rapidly and successfully used for genome engineering, including deletions, insertions, replacements, and point mutations, without inactivation of the methyl-directed mismatch repair (MMR) system and plasmid cloning. The method we describe here facilitates positive genome-edited recombinants with selection efficiencies ranging from 57 to 92%. Using our method, we increased lycopene production (3.4-fold) by replacing the ribosome binding site (RBS) of the rate-limiting gene (dxs) in the 1-deoxy-D-xylulose-5-phosphate (DXP) biosynthesis pathway with a strong RBS. Thus, this method could be used to achieve scarless, proficient, and targeted genome editing for engineering E. coli strains